Lei Jun's Last Stand: Can Xiaomi's Ecosystem Fleet Conquer the Automotive Old World?

Abstract: When Lei Jun defined Xiaomi's car venture as his "last battle," it wasn't hyperbole; it was a meticulously planned endgame. The goal isn't to build a better car, but to deploy its undefeated "internet blitzkrieg" playbook to complete the final piece of its "Human x Car x Home" ecosystem empire. This analysis will deconstruct, with unprecedented detail, the three core military forces Xiaomi has deployed for this campaign: the Fanatical Air Force, the Supply Chain Landing Craft, and the Ecosystem Stronghold. We will use hard data and concrete examples to analyze whether this "asset-light fleet," sailing from the world of consumer electronics, represents a disruptive "new species invasion" or if it will run aground on the "Old World" of the auto industry—a continent fortified by heavy assets, long cycles, and a century of experience.

---

The Clarion Call: "I'm Willing to Bet My Entire Reputation"

"This will be the last major entrepreneurial project of my life. I am willing to bet my entire reputation and all my past achievements, to fight for Xiaomi Motors."

When Lei Jun spoke these words in March 2021, he set an epic tone for Xiaomi's automotive story. This was not just a business expansion; it was a high-stakes gamble of personal reputation and corporate destiny. Market analysts quickly deciphered the strategic intent: this wasn't about entering the auto industry, but about winning the "battle for the ecosystem's final loop."

A Morgan Stanley analyst hit the nail on the head, noting that Xiaomi's disruptive power comes from "its successful marketing, brand, and, to a greater extent, an already established ecosystem." The automobile is the most critical, highest-value smart terminal connecting the physical and digital worlds. For Xiaomi, which already boasts 943.7 million IoT devices and hundreds of millions of mobile users, the absence of this piece left a gaping strategic hole in its "Human x Car x Home" empire. The launch of the SU7 was the clarion call to fill that void.

Yet, a question looms: Is a nimble fleet, accustomed to "air and sea blitzkriegs" in consumer electronics, truly prepared for the brutal "ground war" on the automotive continent—a war that demands heavy armor and a protracted battle of attrition?

The Three Armies: Deconstructing Xiaomi's Expeditionary Force

Xiaomi's expeditionary force is composed of three well-trained, coordinated divisions that have already won decisive victories on the smartphone and IoT battlefields.

Army #1: The Fanatical Air Force

Xiaomi's most formidable weapon is the "Fanatical Air Force" it has honed for over a decade. This force consists of tens of millions of "Mi Fans," who are not just consumers but fervent believers, proactive evangelists, and staunch defenders.

• Blitzkrieg Assault: Crushing the Dimension of Time
  The SU7 launch event was itself a masterfully orchestrated "strategic bombing." The 88,898 confirmed orders secured within the subsequent 24 hours acted like a dense "missile barrage," instantly overwhelming the psychological defenses of competitors. By the end of 2024, locked-in orders had surpassed 248,000.
  The terrifying power of these numbers lies in a temporal comparison:

  • NIO: It took approximately 11 months for its first model, the ES8, to produce its 10,000th vehicle.
  • XPeng: Its first model, the G3, took 188 days to reach the 10,000-unit production milestone.
    In one day, Xiaomi achieved what its rivals took months, or even a year, to accomplish. This is backed by the sheer scale of its community: Xiaomi's global internet services have 718.8 million monthly active users, and CEO Lei Jun's personal Weibo account alone has 26.8 million followers. In contrast, the community platforms of XPeng and Li Auto are only in the millions.

• Cost Advantage: The War Fought for Free
  The existence of this "Air Force" makes Xiaomi's "mobilization cost" incredibly low. It doesn't need to spend fortunes on market education and advertising like traditional automakers. Data shows the Volkswagen Group's marketing expenses are as high as 6.74% of revenue, while even the famously lean Tesla requires 0.2%. Xiaomi's model relies more on word-of-mouth from its fans and user-generated content (UGC)—the most efficient and cheapest form of "cruise missile."

Army #2: The Ecosystem Stronghold

After storming the beaches, a secure "stronghold" must be established, and this is precisely the role of Xiaomi's ecosystem. The SU7 is not an isolated car; it is the "mobile command center" of the Xiaomi smart ecosystem.

• Seamless Domination: From User to Believer
  Built on the unified HyperOS, the SU7 can seamlessly connect with over 1,000 Xiaomi smart home devices. From the car's 16.1-inch central control screen, users can control their home's lights, air conditioning, and door locks as easily as they operate their phones. This deep integration of "human, car, and home" creates an incredibly sticky "gravitational field."
  Early user feedback describes it as "magical" and "seamless." When your watch, phone, TV, and speakers all come from the same "arms dealer," it's very difficult to choose the "enemy's" equipment for your next car. This strategy of capturing an industry by controlling its "brain" shares a striking resemblance with the playbook of another tech giant, Huawei, as both attempt to become the “Puppet Master” defining the soul of future vehicles.

• Conversion and Transfusion: The Ecosystem's Payback
  This "stronghold" not only retains users but also provides a continuous "blood transfusion." Early data indicates that over 70% of SU7 owners are existing Xiaomi users, with more than 50% being Xiaomi phone users. This means Xiaomi's massive existing user base is being steadily converted into high-value car owners.
  More importantly, the software services and cross-selling from the ecosystem can provide a valuable profit subsidy for the initially loss-making car hardware business. In Q1 2025, the gross margin of Xiaomi's internet services business was a staggering 76.9%. This high-profit segment will serve as a critical war chest to sustain the cash-burning automotive campaign.

Army #3: The Supply Chain Landing Craft

If the "Fanatical Air Force" secures air superiority and the "Ecosystem Stronghold" consolidates the rear, then Xiaomi's "Supply Chain Landing Craft" is responsible for storming the beaches and establishing a "beachhead" of cost advantage.

• Strategic Procurement: The Art of Alliance
  Xiaomi is not fighting alone; it has assembled an "allied force" of industry giants. It procures batteries from both BYD (Blade Battery) and CATL (Qilin Battery), and core chips from both Qualcomm (Snapdragon 8295 for the cockpit) and NVIDIA (Orin for autonomous driving). This diversified procurement strategy gives it immense bargaining power with any single supplier and ensures supply chain stability. This capability stands in stark contrast to the “empire” built by BYD on absolute vertical integration.

• Cost Annihilation: Transferring Experience from Phones to Cars
  The most direct result of this supply chain mastery is price. The SU7 Standard version starts at 215,900 RMB, precisely anchoring it below the Tesla Model 3's 245,900 RMB. This isn't a simple loss-leader strategy; it's a meticulously calculated "cost annihilation" campaign. The stunning 23.2% gross margin it achieved in Q1 2025 is the best proof of its supply chain strategy's success. This is built on the back of over a decade of partnership and trust transferred from the consumer electronics space with partners like Qualcomm and BOE.

Clash of Civilizations: Asset-Light Fleet vs. Asset-Heavy Continent

Xiaomi's entry is less a product competition and more a head-on collision between two business civilizations. The core conflict is visible on the balance sheet:

Comparison Metric	Xiaomi (Ecosystem Fleet)	Tesla (Technology Empire)	BYD (Manufacturing Behemoth)
Business Philosophy	Asset-light, fast iteration. Hardware as entry, ecosystem as profit.	Vertical integration. Technology & software define value.	Extreme vertical integration. Scale & cost are everything.
Asset Model	Asset-Light	Asset-Heavy	Ultra-Asset-Heavy
Fixed Assets / Total Assets (Q1 2025)	4.35%	29.64%	36.37%
R&D Focus	Software, AI, Ecosystem Interconnection (4.7B RMB on first car's AD)	AI (FSD), Batteries, Vehicle Control	Batteries, Semiconductors, Hardware Integration (54.2B RMB R&D in 2024)

4.35% vs. 36.37%. This stunning data gap reveals the essence of the war. Xiaomi's "Ecosystem Fleet" has an extremely shallow draft, allowing it to navigate with incredible speed and flexibility in shallows where traditional giants cannot sail. It initially "borrowed" a production license through a partnership with BAIC, then rapidly evolved to establish its own "Xiaomi Smart Super Factory." This factory boasts an ultra-high automation rate of 91% and a LiDAR inspection system with an accuracy of ±0.05mm, showing that while Xiaomi is "light," it has not compromised on core manufacturing.

BYD and Tesla, in contrast, are classic "heavy-asset continental armies." They believe that only by controlling everything from the mines to the chips to final assembly can they build an insurmountable moat. This is what makes this war so fascinating: Will the nimble fleet that has mastered "user mindshare" be better adapted for the future, or will the heavy-armored legions that have mastered the "physical world" win the ultimate victory?

The Verdict: Glory and Thorns

While Wall Street analysts (from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, etc.) have laid a "wreath of honor" on Xiaomi's expedition with sky-high valuations (Goldman values the auto business at $37 billion) and sales forecasts (Goldman predicts 411,000 units in 2025), on the real battlefield, glory and thorns always come together.

• Glory: The Miracle of Profit and the Premium Breakthrough

  • The most dazzling achievement was realizing a 23.2% gross margin in its auto business in the very first quarter, in the midst of China's bloody EV price war. This not only surpassed its own mobile phone business but also sent a chill down the spines of all competitors.
  • More critically, the highest-priced Max version accounted for over 40% of orders. This proves Xiaomi successfully elevated its brand image from "value for money" to "tech-forward trendsetter," with consumers willing to pay a premium for its technology and design.

• Thorns: The Quagmire of Quality Control and the Hell of Production

  • However, the expeditionary force quickly bogged down in the "Old World's" mud. A series of quality control issues emerged: front bumper deformation on early models, accusations of false advertising over "decorative" carbon fiber air ducts, a brake pad burnout incident during a track day, and a massive controversy over an OTA update that limited power output. The heaviest blow came when the Xiaomi SU7 ranked last among 29 peer models in the Q1 2025 auto quality rankings published by a national quality supervision agency.
  • Simultaneously, the massive order volume turned into "production hell." As of July 2025, the waiting time for an SU7 stretched to 38-50 weeks, and the wait for the new YU7 SUV extended to 53-62 weeks (up to 14 months). The long wait is mercilessly eroding the patience and loyalty of its fans.

Final Judgment:

Xiaomi's last battle is, fundamentally, a war over the "right to define." It is betting that the core value of future cars will no longer be steel, chassis, and engines, but software, data, and ecosystem services.

The risks of this gamble are immense: production failures, a broken cash flow (the auto business lost 6.2 billion RMB in 2024 and 500 million RMB in Q1 2025), or the failure of the ecosystem narrative to materialize. Any single weakness could sink the entire fleet. But the rewards are equally tantalizing: if successful, Xiaomi will achieve Apple-like platform dominance and high-margin profits, completing the final coronation of its business empire.

The final outcome of this expedition will be decided by the victors of three key battles:

1. The Battle of Quality Control: Can it quickly escape the quality quagmire and build the long-term credibility required by the auto industry?
2. The Battle of Production: Can it convert orders into deliveries without sacrificing quality, meeting the market's immense expectations?
3. The Battle of Profit: Can it sustain a healthy gross margin (despite the impressive first quarter, each car still loses an estimated $903) amid a fierce price war, proving the long-term viability of its business model?

The war has begun, but the endgame is far from over. Lei Jun and his ecosystem fleet are sailing in uncharted waters, woven with both glory and thorns.

---

About This Report

We believe the most exciting investment stories are the ones not yet being told. "Rise With China" is your guide to the hidden champions and overlooked giants of the Chinese market. We cut through the noise with data-driven analysis to find you alpha. Disclaimer: This is not financial advice.